What type of agency agreement is classified as non-exclusive?

The classification of agency agreements primarily revolves around the level of exclusivity granted to the agent. A non-exclusive agency agreement allows the principal to retain the right to engage multiple agents to represent them simultaneously. This is particularly common in oral agency agreements, which can often be more informal in nature and may not bind the principal to any single agent.

In the context of non-exclusive agreements, oral agreements can allow for flexibility and the ability to work with various agents without the restriction imposed by exclusivity. This means that if one agent does not succeed in completing a transaction, the principal can still rely on others to find potential buyers or tenants.

On the other hand, a written agency agreement typically contains more formal stipulations and often specifies exclusivity in favor of one agent. Exclusive agency agreements, as indicated by the terminology, involve the principal granting exclusive rights to a single agent to make sales or leases, which is the opposite of non-exclusive. Implied agency agreements, which may arise through actions or conduct rather than explicit terms, can also vary in exclusivity but are not inherently categorized as non-exclusive by default.

Therefore, oral agency agreements are most accurately characterized as non-exclusive, aligning with the flexible nature of their formation and enforcement.